Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BAV GroupBAV Group
VS
Acosta GroupAcosta Group
BAV Group

BAV Group

3 Columbus Circle, New York, 10019, US

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bavgroup.com
750/1000Fair

BAV Group, a VML and WPP consultancy, is the world’s leading authority on data-driven branding. We convert brand insight into business growth. Using BrandAsset® Valuator, a global database of consumer perceptions of brands, BAV informs strategic and creative solution...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Acosta Group

Acosta Group

6600 Corporate Center Pkwy, Jacksonville, 32216, US

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.acosta.group/
774/1000Fair

Acosta Group fuses storied expertise, unmatched connectivity and advanced insight to accelerate brand growth – everywhere you sell. Our collective of the most trusted retail, marketing and foodservice agencies is reimagining how people connect with brands at every point...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:38,367
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BAV Group

BAV Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Acosta Group

Acosta Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAV Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BAV Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAV Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Acosta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BAV Group

BAV Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Acosta Group

Acosta Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BAV Group company and Acosta Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BAV Group and Acosta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BAV Group and Acosta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BAV Group or Acosta Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BAV Group or Acosta Group ?
Between BAV Group and Acosta Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BAV Group and Acosta Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9