Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BAV GroupBAV Group
VS
AccentureAccenture
BAV Group

BAV Group

3 Columbus Circle, New York, 10019, US

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bavgroup.com
750/1000Fair

BAV Group, a VML and WPP consultancy, is the world’s leading authority on data-driven branding. We convert brand insight into business growth. Using BrandAsset® Valuator, a global database of consumer perceptions of brands, BAV informs strategic and creative solution...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Accenture

Accenture

Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2, IE

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.accenture.com
613/1000Poor

Accenture helps the world’s leading enterprises reinvent by building their digital core and unleashing the power of AI to create value at speed for organizations across industries. Our strategy is to be the reinvention partner of choice for our clients and lead in the s...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:690,859
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BAV Group

BAV Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Accenture

Accenture

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAV Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Accenture has 586.27% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BAV Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAV Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Accenture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BAV Group

BAV Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Accenture

Accenture

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FBI1791261379
🔒 Incident : Breach
ACC1791261644
🔒 Incident : Breach
GIT1791930487

FAQ

Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BAV Group company and Accenture company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BAV Group and Accenture, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BAV Group and Accenture, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BAV Group or Accenture ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BAV Group or Accenture ?
Between BAV Group and Accenture, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BAV Group and Accenture, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3