Comparison Overview
Batchelor & Kimball, Inc.

Batchelor & Kimball, Inc.
2227 Plunkett Road NW, Conyers, GA, US, 30012
Last Update: 05/03/2026
Batchelor & Kimball is a mechanical engineering and plumbing contractor specializing in projects that call for advanced expertise and problem-solving. For more than 40 years, B&K has been a go-to partner of top U.S. contractors and facility owners — most notably for HV...

Tata Projects
14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, 400087, IN
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Batchelor & Kimball, Inc.







Tata Projects






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Batchelor & Kimball, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2026.
Incident History - Batchelor & Kimball, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Batchelor & Kimball, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Batchelor & Kimball, Inc.

Tata Projects
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.