Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bata ChileBata Chile
VS
CoachCoach
Bata Chile

Bata Chile

Maipu, Santiago, Region Metropolitana 7591538, CL

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bata.cl
767/1000Fair

Bata es una empresa global con actividades en los cinco continentes controlada por cuatro Unidades Regionales de Negocios Comerciales (CBUs). Cada una de estas unidades se especializa en la región de tareas específicas, tales como el desarrollo de productos, compras, o ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Coach

Coach

10 Hudson Yards, New York, NY, US, 10001

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coach.com
793/1000Fair

Coach was founded in 1941 as a family-run workshop. In a Manhattan loft, six artisans handcrafted a collection of leather goods using skills handed down from generation to generation. Discerning consumers soon began to seek out the quality and unique nature of Coach cra...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:12,832
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bata Chile

Bata Chile

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coach

Coach

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bata Chile in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coach in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bata Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bata Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bata Chile

Bata Chile

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Coach

Coach

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bata Chile company and Coach company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bata Chile and Coach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bata Chile and Coach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bata Chile or Coach ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bata Chile or Coach ?
Between Bata Chile and Coach, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bata Chile and Coach, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9