Comparison Overview
Basic-Fit
Basic-Fit
Wegalaan, Hoofddorp, 2132JC, NL
Last Update: 29/04/2026
Founded in 2013, Basic-Fit is proud to have more than 4.4+ million members in more than 1,600+ clubs across the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Spain, and Germany. Thanks to our fast growth we can call ourselves Europe’s value-for-money fitness leader. Our Mi...
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Forever Living Products and its affiliates are the largest growers, manufacturer and distributors of Aloe Vera products. The key to Forever Living's success is commitment to quality and purity. In order to ensure the highest quality, Forever Living cultivates aloe vera ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Basic-Fit
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Basic-Fit has 204.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - Basic-Fit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Basic-Fit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Basic-Fit
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Use after free in Aura in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.128 allowed a local attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: High)
Use after free in Ozone in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 150.0.7871.128 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.128 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Use after free in Cast in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.128 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Use after free in Network in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.128 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)