Comparison Overview
BASF Agricultural Solutions

BASF Agricultural Solutions
Speyerer Straße 2, Limburgerhof, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67117, DE
Last Update: 25/02/2026
We do everything in our power to build a sustainable future for agriculture by connecting innovation, customers and society. Today’s farmers are facing a variety of challenges like never before. A rapidly growing global population. Climate change. The need to produce m...

Syngenta Group
Rosentalstrasse 67, Basel, 4002, CH
Last Update: 02/06/2026
To help feed 10 billion people while reducing emissions and improve biodiversity. This is our mission as the global agriculture technology leader. With over 56,000 employees in more than 90 countries and hundreds of thousands of agricultural partners worldwide, we are c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BASF Agricultural Solutions







Syngenta Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BASF Agricultural Solutions in 2026.
Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)
Syngenta Group has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - BASF Agricultural Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BASF Agricultural Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Syngenta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Syngenta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BASF Agricultural Solutions

Syngenta Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.