Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BASF AntwerpBASF Antwerp
VS
EvonikEvonik
BASF Antwerp

BASF Antwerp

Scheldelaan 600, Antwerp, 2040, BE

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.basf.be/antwerpen
758/1000Fair

BASF vestigde zich 60 jaar geleden in de haven van Antwerpen. De site groeide intussen uit tot het grootste geïntegreerde productiecentrum in België en het op één na grootste van de BASF-groep wereldwijd. Dagelijks produceren meer dan 3.700 medewerkers in een vijftigtal...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Evonik

Evonik

Evonik Industries AG, Rellinghauser Straße 1-11, Essen, NRW, DE, 45128

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.evonik.com
780/1000Fair

Evonik goes beyond the boundaries of chemistry with its combination of innovative strength and leading technological expertise. The global chemical company, headquartered in Essen, Germany, is active in more than 100 countries. The common motivation of the approximately...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:14,509
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BASF Antwerp

BASF Antwerp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Evonik

Evonik

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BASF Antwerp in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Evonik in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BASF Antwerp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BASF Antwerp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Evonik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Evonik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BASF Antwerp

BASF Antwerp

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Evonik

Evonik

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BASF Antwerp company and Evonik company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BASF Antwerp and Evonik, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BASF Antwerp and Evonik, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BASF Antwerp or Evonik ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BASF Antwerp or Evonik ?
Between BASF Antwerp and Evonik, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BASF Antwerp and Evonik, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9