Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Baruch CollegeBaruch College
VS
Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChilePontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Baruch College

Baruch College

One Bernard Baruch Way, New York, NY, US, 10010

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/
742/1000Moderate

Baruch College offers undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral degree programs to 20,000 students from 150-plus countries who speak more than 100 languages. A Baruch education is defined by academic excellence, accessibility, and outcomes. A thriving, urban institution i...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:4,289
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Avda. Libertador Bernardo OHiggins 340, Santiago, 8320000, CL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uc.cl/
805/1000Good

Founded in 1888, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile is currently one of the leading higher education institutions in Latin America. Approximately 22,000 students are enrolled in graduate and undergraduate programs, which encompass a wide range of disciplines an...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,981
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Baruch College

Baruch College

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baruch College in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Baruch College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baruch College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Baruch College

Baruch College

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Malware
BAR1132181023
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Baruch College company and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Baruch College and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Baruch College and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Baruch College or Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Baruch College or Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile ?
Between Baruch College and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Baruch College and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2