Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Barricade Cyber Solutions

Barricade Cyber Solutions Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

barricadecyber.com

Founded by a U.S. Marine, Barricade is built on discipline, precision, and accountability. Unlike large firms, we move fast, communicate clearly, and always put your mission first. Trusted worldwide by business owners, breach counsel, and MSPs, we’ve helped thousands of organizations recover quickly, protect reputations, and harden defenses against the next incident. With Barricade Cyber, you don’t just get incident response - you get a partner who stands between your organization and cyber attacks.


BCS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

BCS
Company Information
Website:https://www.barricadecyber.com
Employees number:3
Number of followers:1,983
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:barricadecyber.com
BCS Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
logo
BCSComputer and Network Security
Updated:
22/04/2026
564/1000
Very Poor
Ca
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
BCS Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
BCSComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

BCS
BCSVery Poor
Current Score
564Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
2 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
574Before Incident
MAY 2026
568Before Incident
APRIL 2026
564Before Incident
MARCH 2026
561Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
556Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
551Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
546Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
540Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
535Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
529Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
523Before Incident
JULY 2025
517Before Incident
APRIL 2025
653Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Apr 2025BCS
Krybit and 0APT: A ransomware group is now threatening to expose another group’s members in a bizarre cybercrime feud that is spiraling fast

0APT Threatens to Dox Rival Ransomware Group Krybit in Unprecedented Cybercriminal Feud

491After Incident
CRITICAL-162
BAR1776889447
0APT Threatens to Dox Rival Ransomware Group Krybit in Unprecedented Cybercriminal Feud A new escalation in the ransomware underworld has emerged as the cybercriminal group 0APT publicly threatened to expose the identities of operators behind the rival Krybit ransomware operation. In a leaked blog post, 0APT issued an ultimatum: pay an undisclosed sum or face the release of personal details, including names, photos, and locations of Krybit affiliates. The group also extended an unusual offer to Krybit’s victims, promising decryption assistance an attempt to leverage its double-extortion tactics. However, cybersecurity experts note that such threats lose potency when directed at fellow criminals, who lack reputational concerns. Despite this, 0APT released a sample of allegedly stolen Krybit data as a warning, including plaintext credentials and five cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Analysis by Barricade Cyber Solutions found no evidence of paid ransoms to Krybit, contradicting the group’s public claims of success. Krybit’s website is currently offline, displaying a generic maintenance message. The conflict mirrors past intra-criminal disputes, such as DragonForce’s 2025 attacks on rivals BlackLock and Mamona, and its later takeover of RansomHub in 2024. Security firm Halcyon has acknowledged 0APT’s technical capabilities but noted that its initial victim list appeared inflated. For organizations encrypted by Krybit, the feud presents a rare but risky opportunity. While 0APT claims to offer decryption keys, its criminal nature makes such offers unreliable. Victims are advised to preserve forensic evidence, though engaging with either group remains hazardous. The incident underscores the volatile and unpredictable nature of ransomware rivalries.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware Feud / Extortion
MOTIVATION
Extortion / Disruption of Rival Group
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Personal details (names, photos, locations), plaintext credentials, cryptocurrency wallet addressesOperational Impact: Krybit’s website offline (maintenance message)Identity Theft Risk: High (for Krybit affiliates)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Personal details, credentials, cryptocurrency wallet addressesSensitivity Of Data: High (PII of Krybit affiliates)Data Exfiltration: Yes (sample data released)Personally Identifiable Information: Names, photos, locations
JUNE 2024
748Before Incident
Ransomware
16 Jun 2024BCS
Victim of Akira Ransomware Group (unnamed utility/organization from article)

The EDR/XDR Evasion Crisis: Detection-Centric Security Fails Against Modern Threats

634After Incident
CRITICAL-114
BAR1162711102325
The Akira Ransomware Group targeted an unnamed organization, initially blocked by its EDR solution. However, attackers exploited a vulnerable webcam discovered via a network scan to bypass EDR defenses and deploy ransomware. The breach highlights EDR/XDR blind spots in OT/IoT-IT convergence, where legitimate tools (e.g., RDP, PsExec) are weaponized to evade detection. The attack disrupted operations, demonstrating how ransomware groups leverage living-off-the-land (LotL) techniques and EDR killers (e.g., EDRSilencer) to disable protections. The incident aligns with broader trends: 48% of 2024 ransomware attacks successfully disabled EDR/XDR, and 57% of such attacks abuse utilities/tunnelers. The organization likely faced data encryption, operational downtime, and potential financial/legal repercussions, with attackers self-reporting the intrusion in nearly 50% of cases rather than being detected proactively.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
EDR/XDR EvasionRansomwareSupply Chain AttackLiving-off-the-Land (LotL) TechniquesIoT/OT Exploitation
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Ransomware, RaaS)Data Exfiltration for Dark Web SalesDisruption of OperationsExploitation of Detection Gaps
IMPACT
Endpoints (EDR/XDR Bypassed)IoT/OT Devices (e.g., webcams)Network Infrastructure (Lateral Movement)Supply Chain PartnersSecurity Team Burnout (80% overwhelmed by alerts)Repeated Investigations of Same IncidentsDelayed Incident Response (MTTI: 194 days)Loss of Defender Confidence in Detection ToolsErosion of Trust in EDR/XDR EffectivenessPerception of Reactive Security Posture
DATA BREACH
Data Exfiltration: Likely (via RaaS and Supply Chain Attacks)Data Encryption: Yes (Ransomware Attacks)

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for BCS ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on BCS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with BCS ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view BCS's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?