Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Barnum Financial Group - West DivisionBarnum Financial Group - West Division
VS
Wells FargoWells Fargo
Barnum Financial Group - West Division

Barnum Financial Group - West Division

600 University Street, Seattle, Washington, 98101, US

Last Update: 31/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.barnum-west.com/
754/1000Fair

The days of traditional investment models are behind us. At Barnum Financial Group - West Division, we are forging a path towards a clearer and more personalized financial strategy. This new philosophy of financial advisement takes a holistic approach that begins with ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

420 Montgomery St, San Francisco, California, US, 94103

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wellsfargo.com
800/1000Good

Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is a diversified, community-based financial services company with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets. Wells Fargo’s vision is to satisfy our customers’ financial needs and help them succeed financially. Founded in 1852 and headquarte...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:221,512
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Barnum Financial Group - West Division

Barnum Financial Group - West Division

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barnum Financial Group - West Division in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells Fargo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Barnum Financial Group - West Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barnum Financial Group - West Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wells Fargo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells Fargo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Barnum Financial Group - West Division

Barnum Financial Group - West Division

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITWELNAVUSAFID1771266975
🔒 Incident : Breach
WEL033091825
🔒 Incident : Breach
WEL539072925

FAQ

Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division company and Wells Fargo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division and Wells Fargo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division and Wells Fargo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Barnum Financial Group - West Division or Wells Fargo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Barnum Financial Group - West Division or Wells Fargo ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division and Wells Fargo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Barnum Financial Group - West Division and Wells Fargo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2