Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Barnhart Crane & Rigging » BAR1779467251

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BAR1779467251)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-82
Company Score Before Incident591 / 1000
Company Score After Incident509 / 1000
Company LinkView Barnhart Crane & Rigging Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERBAR1779467251
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and sensitive information of...
INCIDENT DATE20/04/2026
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Barnhart Crane & Rigging's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Barnhart Crane & Rigging Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Barnhart Crane & Rigging breach identified under incident ID BAR1779467251.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Barnhart Crane & Rigging's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/barnhart-crane-&-rigging, the number of followers: 43555, the industry type: Engineering Services and the number of employees: 1103 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 591 and after the incident was 509 with a difference of -82 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Barnhart Crane & Rigging and their customers.

On 21 April 2026, Barnhart Crane & Rigging Company, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Barnhart Crane & Rigging Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Information of Nearly 23,000 Individuals".

Shamis & Gentile P.A., a class action law firm specializing in data breach cases, is investigating a cybersecurity incident involving Barnhart Crane & Rigging Company, Inc., a leading mechanical and industrial engineering contractor based in Memphis, Tennessee.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and sensitive information of 22,822 individuals, with nearly 22,822 records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised the personal data of 22,822 individuals and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident involving Barnhart Crane & Rigging. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, driver’s license, passport numbers exposed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating financial account details and health information compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data includes full names, SSNs, DOB, health info and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 22,822 individuals sensitive data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of 22,822 individuals exposed and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating highly sensitive information compromised. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident with significant data exposure and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential class action lawsuits due to breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References