Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BarnesCareBarnesCare
VS
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University Medical Center
BarnesCare

BarnesCare

5000 Manchester Ave, St Louis, Missouri, undefined, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.barnescare.com/
763/1000Fair

BarnesCare is the occupational medicine division of BJC HealthCare. BarnesCare has worked with St. Louis businesses since 1946, applying the best occupational medicine to evaluate and treat your employees. Our goal is to keep your employees healthy and safe by working ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

2525 West End Ave., Ste. 500, Nashville, 37203, US

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
694/1000Weak

From specializing in transplants and pediatric cancer to solving undiagnosed diseases, we know solving the most complex problems prepares us to solve any problem. We are committed to excellence in patient care, research, and medical education and training. We thrive on ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:21,784
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BarnesCare

BarnesCare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BarnesCare in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BarnesCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BarnesCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vanderbilt University Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BarnesCare

BarnesCare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VAN1784939082
🔒 Incident : Breach
VAN1785018273

FAQ

Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BarnesCare company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BarnesCare and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BarnesCare and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BarnesCare or Vanderbilt University Medical Center ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BarnesCare or Vanderbilt University Medical Center ?
Between BarnesCare and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BarnesCare and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA