Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BarnesCareBarnesCare
VS
Hospital AuthorityHospital Authority
BarnesCare

BarnesCare

5000 Manchester Ave, St Louis, Missouri, undefined, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.barnescare.com/
763/1000Fair

BarnesCare is the occupational medicine division of BJC HealthCare. BarnesCare has worked with St. Louis businesses since 1946, applying the best occupational medicine to evaluate and treat your employees. Our goal is to keep your employees healthy and safe by working ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hospital Authority

Hospital Authority

Hospital Authority Building, Hong Kong, 852, HK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
703/1000Moderate

The Hospital Authority (HA) is a statutory body established under the Hospital Authority Ordinance in 1990. We have been responsible for managing Hong Kong's public hospitals services since December 1991. We are accountable to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,402
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BarnesCare

BarnesCare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hospital Authority

Hospital Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BarnesCare in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Hospital Authority has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BarnesCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BarnesCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hospital Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hospital Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BarnesCare

BarnesCare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hospital Authority

Hospital Authority

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HOS1775284192

FAQ

Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BarnesCare company and Hospital Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BarnesCare and Hospital Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BarnesCare and Hospital Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BarnesCare or Hospital Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BarnesCare or Hospital Authority ?
Between BarnesCare and Hospital Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BarnesCare and Hospital Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA