Comparison Overview

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

VS

B&M Retail

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

33 E 17th St, New York, US, 10003
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Barnes & Noble proudly serves America with approximately 600 bookstores across all fifty states, and are busy opening newly designed stores in communities nationwide. We are an innovator in publishing, retail, and digital media, including our award-winning NOOK® products and an expansive collection of digital reading and entertainment content. We welcome creative, dedicated, and service-oriented team members who are passionate about being an integral part of our dynamic community and helping it thrive. Whether your expertise is in retail, merchandising, publishing, marketing, technology, or finance, we have a place for you at Barnes & Noble.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 13,816
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

B&M Retail

Estuary Commerce Park , Liverpool, Merseyside, GB, L24 8RJ
Last Update: 2026-01-18

B&M is a fast-growing discount retailer, operating from over 750 high street and out of town stores across the UK, with a team of over 38,000! In the UK, we offer customers a broad range of FMCG brands and non-grocery products at sensational prices. Our aim is to provide customers with a fun and exciting shopping experience, offering them great products and fantastic value so that they return again and again to a B&M store. Our success is down to our customers and built on “word of mouth” – with an average 5 million customer transactions across our stores each week. We spend next to nothing on advertising so that we can focus on keeping the prices of our products as low as possible. The Group also owns a chain of over 100 general merchandise and grocery stores in France under the B&M brand. Our Heron Foods business operates over 300 discount convenience stores in England and Wales. To find out more about joining one of the UK’s fastest growing retailers, please visit our website www.bmstores.co.uk/careers

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 11,372
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barnes-&-noble.jpeg
Barnes & Noble, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/b-m-retail-limited.jpeg
B&M Retail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Barnes & Noble, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
B&M Retail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barnes & Noble, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B&M Retail in 2026.

Incident History — Barnes & Noble, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barnes & Noble, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — B&M Retail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B&M Retail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barnes-&-noble.jpeg
Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2012
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Physical Tampering (PIN Pad Devices)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Likely)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/b-m-retail-limited.jpeg
B&M Retail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barnes & Noble, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to B&M Retail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Barnes & Noble, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas B&M Retail company has not reported any.

In the current year, B&M Retail company and Barnes & Noble, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither B&M Retail company nor Barnes & Noble, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither B&M Retail company nor Barnes & Noble, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Barnes & Noble, Inc. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while B&M Retail company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. company nor B&M Retail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. company nor B&M Retail company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Barnes & Noble, Inc. company employs more people globally than B&M Retail company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Barnes & Noble, Inc. nor B&M Retail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.