Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bar Convent BrooklynBar Convent Brooklyn
VS
The Coca-Cola CompanyThe Coca-Cola Company
Bar Convent Brooklyn

Bar Convent Brooklyn

72 Noble St, Brooklyn, 11222, US

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Driven by an appreciation and passion for premium and craft spirits, Bar Convent Brooklyn (BCB) is a welcoming and collaborative environment in which the pioneers of the bar and beverage community gather to celebrate and sculpt the future of liquid culture through educa...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company

One Coca-Cola Plaza, Atlanta, 30313, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
823/1000Good

From our roots at the counter of a local Atlanta pharmacy, to our current portfolio of more than 200 beverages, The Coca-Cola Company is one of the most globally-recognized brands in the world. Today, our lineup features beloved beverage brands, including ​ Coca-Cola, S...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:53,568
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bar Convent Brooklyn

Bar Convent Brooklyn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bar Convent Brooklyn in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Coca-Cola Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bar Convent Brooklyn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bar Convent Brooklyn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Coca-Cola Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Coca-Cola Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bar Convent Brooklyn

Bar Convent Brooklyn

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE182330422
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE2144722
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE835080425

FAQ

Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn and The Coca-Cola Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn and The Coca-Cola Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bar Convent Brooklyn or The Coca-Cola Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bar Convent Brooklyn or The Coca-Cola Company ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn and The Coca-Cola Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bar Convent Brooklyn and The Coca-Cola Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8