Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BarclaycardBarclaycard
VS
Nationale-NederlandenNationale-Nederlanden
Barclaycard

Barclaycard

1, Churchill Place, London, GB, E14 5HP

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.barclaycard.com
766/1000Fair

Barclaycard, part of Barclays Bank UK PLC, is a leading global payment business that helps consumers, retailers and businesses to make and take payments flexibly, and to access short-term credit and point of sale finance. The company is a pioneer of new forms of payme...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:3,079
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nationale-Nederlanden

Nationale-Nederlanden

Pr. Beatrixlaan 35, Den Haag, ., NL, 2595 AK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nn.nl
775/1000Fair

NN Group is an international financial services company, active in 10 countries, with a strong presence in a number of European countries and Japan. Our roots lie in the Netherlands, with a rich history of more than 175 years. With our 15,000 employees, NN Group provid...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:10,660
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Barclaycard

Barclaycard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nationale-Nederlanden

Nationale-Nederlanden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclaycard in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nationale-Nederlanden in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Barclaycard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclaycard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nationale-Nederlanden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nationale-Nederlanden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Barclaycard

Barclaycard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nationale-Nederlanden

Nationale-Nederlanden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Barclaycard company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Barclaycard and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Barclaycard and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Barclaycard or Nationale-Nederlanden ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Barclaycard or Nationale-Nederlanden ?
Between Barclaycard and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Barclaycard and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8