Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Banyule City CouncilBanyule City Council
VS
Workingfor.beWorkingfor.be
Banyule City Council

Banyule City Council

1 Flintoff Street, Greensborough, Victoria, 3088, AU

Last Update: 05/01/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

We are a local government authority responsible for Banyule City Council. Banyule City Council is located 17 kilometres north-east of central Melbourne with 21 suburbs that cover and area of 63 square kilometres. Our community is made up of diverse cultures, belief...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:568
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Simon Bolivarlaan 30, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.workingfor.be
782/1000Fair

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choos...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Banyule City Council

Banyule City Council

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banyule City Council in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workingfor.be in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Banyule City Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banyule City Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Workingfor.be (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workingfor.be cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Banyule City Council

Banyule City Council

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Banyule City Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Banyule City Council and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Banyule City Council and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Banyule City Council or Workingfor.be ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Banyule City Council or Workingfor.be ?
Between Banyule City Council and Workingfor.be, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Banyule City Council and Workingfor.be, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103591
SUMMARY

DeepWiki-Open through commit d92819a contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GET /codemap/file endpoint via the repo_url parameter. Attackers can supply a non-URL repo_url value to bypass path containment checks and read any file accessible to the API process by specifying absolute file paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103590
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor's length of stay fields. Attackers can induce authenticated administrators to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads in restriction_min_los and restriction_max_los parameters, executing arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103589
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor that fails to escape room_num, floor, and comment field values in input attributes. Attackers can induce authenticated back-office users to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103588
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the exceptions field of the back-office Transplant a module form. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in the exceptions parameter that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103587
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office Hotel Reservation System Book Now search, where date_to and id_room_type parameters are copied into template variables without validation. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in these parameters that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3