Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BankinterBankinter
VS
SberbankSberbank
Bankinter

Bankinter

Paseo de la Castellana 29, Madrid, 28026, ES

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bankinter.com
728/1000Moderate

Bankinter somos una marca de referencia dentro de la banca española por Internet. Una parte fundamental de nuestra estrategia es la calidad en el Servicio al cliente y la Innovación. El espíritu viene definido por nuestros valores de agilidad, entusiasmo, integridad y o...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:6,439
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Sberbank

Sberbank

RU

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://sber.ru
822/1000Good

Сбер — крупнейший банк в России, поставщик надёжных технологических решений и один из ведущих финансовых институтов страны. Мы не боимся меняться и открывать новые горизонты, но в то же время остаёмся верными принципам, сформированным за нашу 180-летнюю историю. Такой п...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11,105
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bankinter

Bankinter

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sberbank

Sberbank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bankinter in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sberbank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bankinter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bankinter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sberbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sberbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bankinter

Bankinter

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EVOBAN1777652813
Sberbank

Sberbank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bankinter company and Sberbank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bankinter and Sberbank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bankinter and Sberbank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bankinter or Sberbank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bankinter or Sberbank ?
Between Bankinter and Sberbank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bankinter and Sberbank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA