Comparison Overview

Bangkok Airways

VS

Etihad

Bangkok Airways

99 Mu 14, Vibhavadirangsit Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok, Bangkok, TH, 10900
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Operating reginal air services from Thailand to South East Asian cities.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,345
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Etihad

P.O. Box 35566, New Airport Road, Khalifa City A, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, AE, 35566
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Marhaba! Welcome to Etihad Airways. We are proud to be the national airline of the UAE, flying to 100+ destinations via Abu Dhabi. At Etihad, we don't stop at the border of what's possible, we go beyond it. Proudly inspired by our Emirati identity, we are dedicated to delivering extraordinary travel experiences, helping our guests realise their ambitions. Our journey started in 2003. Since then, we have proudly helped millions of guests travel the globe. We are honoured to have had over 12 million valued members join our Etihad Guest loyalty programme. Diversity is key in driving us forward. At 12,000+ employees representing 140+ nationalities, our team comes together to deliver exceptional experiences at every stage of the journey. If you share our spirit of ambition and would like to reach new heights, visit https://careers.etihad.com/

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,927
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bangkok-airways.jpeg
Bangkok Airways
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etihadairways.jpeg
Etihad
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bangkok Airways
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Etihad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bangkok Airways in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Etihad has 112.77% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Bangkok Airways (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bangkok Airways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Etihad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etihad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bangkok-airways.jpeg
Bangkok Airways
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etihadairways.jpeg
Etihad
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Etihad company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bangkok Airways company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Etihad company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Bangkok Airways company.

In the current year, Etihad company has reported more cyber incidents than Bangkok Airways company.

Neither Etihad company nor Bangkok Airways company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Etihad company and Bangkok Airways company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Etihad company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bangkok Airways company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bangkok Airways company nor Etihad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Etihad company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bangkok Airways company.

Etihad company employs more people globally than Bangkok Airways company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor Etihad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X