Comparison Overview

Bangkok Airways

VS

avianca

Bangkok Airways

99 Mu 14, Vibhavadirangsit Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok, Bangkok, TH, 10900
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Operating reginal air services from Thailand to South East Asian cities.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,345
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

avianca

Avenida Calle 26 59-15, Bogotá, CO
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

!BIenvenido al sitio oficial! Avianca es la primera aerolínea comercial fundada en las Américas y la segunda en el mundo. Enfocados en alcanzar la excelencia y eficiencia operacional, se dio marcha a una profunda reorganización de los procesos, la cual ha estado acompañada de la modernización y renovación de la flota de aeronaves, la adopción de las mejores prácticas de la industria y el desarrollo de una intensa campaña por el mejoramiento de la cultura interna de servicio. Nos proponemos ahora fortalecer el posicionamiento de la compañía en los diversos mercados a través de la entrega de un servicio superior. Por eso, la trayectoria, el profesionalismo y la experiencia de varias generaciones de hombres y mujeres que por décadas le han dado vida a Avianca, TACA, AeroGal y Tampa Cargo, constituyen ahora nuestra inspiración para convertir la nueva Avianca en el aliado ideal para sus viajes. Avianca acepta los comentarios y quejas que se reciban por este medio pero no podrá dar respuesta a todas éstas. Para asegurar una respuesta adecuada a sus quejas o comentarios, por favor envíelas a Centro Administrativo Avianca - Relaciones con el Cliente, Avenida calle 26 No. 59-15 Bogotá, Colombia o ingréselas a través de http://www.avianca.com/PiedePagina/Contactenos/es/Sugerencias-Reclamos.htm Bogotá: (571)4013434 Resto del país: 1-8000-953434 Código de Ética y Normas de Conductas de los Negocios de Avianca Holdings S.A.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,417
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bangkok-airways.jpeg
Bangkok Airways
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avianca.jpeg
avianca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bangkok Airways
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
avianca
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bangkok Airways in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for avianca in 2025.

Incident History — Bangkok Airways (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bangkok Airways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — avianca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

avianca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bangkok-airways.jpeg
Bangkok Airways
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avianca.jpeg
avianca
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

avianca company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bangkok Airways company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bangkok Airways company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas avianca company has not reported any.

In the current year, avianca company and Bangkok Airways company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither avianca company nor Bangkok Airways company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bangkok Airways company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other avianca company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither avianca company nor Bangkok Airways company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bangkok Airways company nor avianca company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bangkok Airways company nor avianca company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

avianca company employs more people globally than Bangkok Airways company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bangkok Airways nor avianca holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X