Comparison Overview
Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited

Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited
2098 M Tower Building, Phra Khanong, 10260, TH
Last Update: 23/03/2026
Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited, a Thai energy company engaging in business alongside social and environmental stewardship, aims to enhance national energy security with innovation-oriented businesses. This goal is to strengthen business continuity and devel...

Shell
York Road, London, SE1 7NA, GB
Last Update: 19/06/2026
Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, employing 96,000 people across 70+ countries. We serve around 1 million commercial and industrial customers, and around 33 million customers daily at our Shell-branded retail service stations. Our purpose i...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited







Shell






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
Shell has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Shell (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Shell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bangchak Corporation Public Company Limited

Shell
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.