Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

B&GB&G
VS
SharpSharp
B&G

B&G

Navico Ltd. (UK), Templars House, Chandlers Ford, SO53 3TJ, GB

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bandg.com
757/1000Fair

B&G creates marine electronics for sailors, designed and tested by sailors. Since 1955 B&G has been providing easy to use electronics for the best sailors in the world, from an Ocean Race winner to the day sailor, our electronics help sailors make the most of their time...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sharp

Sharp

匠町1 堺市堺区, 大阪府 590-8522, JP

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://global.sharp
764/1000Fair

„ÄêCorporate Name„Äë Sharp Corporation „ÄêHead Office„Äë 1 Takumi-cho, Sakai-ku, Sakai City, Osaka 590-8522, Japan „ÄêManagement Representatives„Äë Masahiro Okitsu, President & Chief Executive Officer „ÄêBusiness Activities„Äë Mainly manufacturing and sales of teleco...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
B&G

B&G

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sharp

Sharp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Electronics Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B&G in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Electronics Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharp in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - B&G (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B&G cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sharp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
B&G

B&G

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sharp

Sharp

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between B&G company and Sharp company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between B&G and Sharp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between B&G and Sharp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - B&G or Sharp ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - B&G or Sharp ?
Between B&G and Sharp, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between B&G and Sharp, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59858
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0735, the C omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/ccomplete.vim interpolates the typeref: or typename: extension field of a tags entry, without escaping, into a :vimgrep pattern that is run through :execute. Because :vimgrep honors the bar as a command separator, a crafted tag field can close the search pattern and append an arbitrary Ex command; opening a hostile .c file whose project tags file contains such an entry and invoking C omni-completion runs that command as the editing user. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0735.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59857
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0725, the single-byte branch of spell_soundfold_sal() in src/spell.c translates a word through a spell file's SAL sound-folding rules into a caller-owned result buffer, but its result writes are guarded with reslen < MAXWLEN, allowing reslen to reach MAXWLEN before res[reslen] = NUL writes one byte past the end of the MAXWLEN-element stack buffer. A boundary-length word passed to soundfold(), or reached via sound-based spell suggestion while a SAL-based spell language is active under a non-multibyte 8-bit encoding, can corrupt the eval_soundfold() stack frame and crash the editor. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0725.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59856
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0736, the PHP omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/phpcomplete.vim interpolates a class or trait name, taken from the contents of the edited buffer, into a search() pattern that is run via win_execute() without escaping. A name containing a single quote can terminate the search() string argument early, and because the bar is honored as an Ex command separator, the remainder of the name is run as Ex commands; via the :! command this allows arbitrary operating-system command execution when a victim opens a crafted PHP file and invokes omni-completion. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0736.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59855
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, Asset.render in app/src/asset/index.ts interpolates the unsanitized this.path value into HTML assigned to innerHTML, allowing a crafted asset link containing a double quote to break out of the src attribute, inject an event handler, and execute JavaScript that can run OS commands in the Electron renderer. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59854
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2