Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BancorBancor
VS
BarclaysBarclays
Bancor

Bancor

Gubelstrasse 11, Zug, 6300, CH

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://bancor.network
726/1000Moderate

An ecosystem of decentralized, open-source DeFi protocols that foster on-chain trading and liquidity. The newest protocol in the Bancor ecosystem and Bancor's flagship product, Carbon🗿CarbonDeFi.xyz, a feature-rich automated trading protocol, now in Beta on Ethereum...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:65
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Barclays

Barclays

1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.home.barclays
816/1000Good

Our vision is to be the UK-centred leader in global finance. We are a diversified bank with comprehensive UK consumer, corporate and wealth and private banking franchises, a leading investment bank and a strong, specialist US consumer bank. Through these five divisions,...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:83,843
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bancor

Bancor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Barclays

Barclays

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bancor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bancor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bancor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Barclays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bancor

Bancor

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAN1630311223
Barclays

Barclays

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEBARHSBLLONATMAR1774391436

FAQ

Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bancor company and Barclays company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bancor and Barclays, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bancor and Barclays, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bancor or Barclays ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bancor or Barclays ?
Between Bancor and Barclays, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bancor and Barclays, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES