Comparison Overview
Banco Pichincha España

Banco Pichincha España
Lagasca 4, Madrid, Madrid, 28001, ES
Last Update: 04/03/2026
En Banco Pichincha nos estamos transformando; por eso, queremos incorporar el mejor talento a nuestro equipo. Buscamos profesionales amantes de la innovación y comprometidos con el servicio al cliente que estén dispuestos a asumir nuevos desafíos. Empezamos a escribir l...

Emirates NBD
Baniyas Road, Opp Dubai Creek Tower, Deira, Dubai, AE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
About Emirates NBD Emirates NBD (DFM: Emirates NBD) is a leading banking group in the MENAT (Middle East, North Africa and Türkiye) region with a presence in 13 countries, serving over 20 million customers. As at 30th September 2023, total assets were AED 836 billion,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Banco Pichincha España







Emirates NBD






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Banco Pichincha España in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
Emirates NBD has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Banco Pichincha España (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Banco Pichincha España cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Emirates NBD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emirates NBD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Banco Pichincha España

Emirates NBD
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.