Comparison Overview
Banco Pichincha Colombia

Banco Pichincha Colombia
Calle 20 No. 42 - 81, Bogotá, Cundinamarca, 111311, CO
Last Update: 19/03/2026
Somos Banco Pichincha Colombia filial del Banco Pichincha Ecuador, mayor banco privado, por capitalización y número de depositantes en este País; con su creciente y exitosa trayectoria en el sector financiero colombiano durante más de 50 años, como “Inversora Pichincha”...

Santander
Avenida de Cantabria S/N, Boadilla del Monte, 28660, ES
Last Update: 20/05/2026
Banco Santander (SAN SM, STD US, BNC LN) is a leading commercial bank, founded in 1857 and headquartered in Spain and one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalization. The group’s activities are consolidated into five global businesses: Retail & Commercial...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Banco Pichincha Colombia







Santander






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Banco Pichincha Colombia in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
Santander has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Banco Pichincha Colombia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Banco Pichincha Colombia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Santander (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Santander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Banco Pichincha Colombia

Santander
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.