Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

nextnext
VS
LSEGLSEG
next

next

Rua Domingos Sérgio dos Anjos, 277 - Jardim Santo Elias , São Paulo, São Paulo, 05136-170, BR

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://next.me
765/1000Fair

O next é um banco digital completo e gratuito, criado em 2017 para simplificar e transformar a vida das pessoas. Reunimos diversos talentos em uma equipe plural, diversa e conectada, que faz do next um lugar único. Nós, nexters, somos movidos pelo desejo de impulsionar ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:653
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LSEG

LSEG

10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7DX, GB

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lseg.com
709/1000Moderate

LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group) is a diversified international markets infrastructure business —earning our clients’ trust for over 300 years. That legacy of customer-focused excellence ensures that you can rely on our expertise in capital formation, intellectual pro...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:25,302
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
next

next

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LSEG

LSEG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for next in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LSEG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - next (X = Date, Y = Severity)

next cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LSEG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LSEG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
next

next

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LSEG

LSEG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BRU0093500092025
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
COL5132151100225

FAQ

Between next company and LSEG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between next company and LSEG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between next and LSEG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between next and LSEG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - next or LSEG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - next or LSEG ?
Between next and LSEG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between next and LSEG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2