Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

banco BVbanco BV
VS
CitizensCitizens
banco BV

banco BV

Av. Das Nacoes Unidas, 14.171 - Torre A, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR, 04794-000

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bv.com.br
784/1000Fair

Olá! Somos o banco BV, uma das maiores instituições financeiras da América Latina, com mais de 37 anos de experiência no mercado e o propósito de tornar mais tranquila a vida financeira de pessoas e empresas. Aqui, acreditamos nas suas conquistas pessoais e realizaç...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:6,116
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Citizens

Citizens

1 Citizens Plaza, Providence, 02903, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.citizensbank.com
550/1000Very Poor

At Citizens, we recognize that the journey to accomplishment is no longer linear and that individuals are made of all they have done and all they are going to do. As one of the oldest and largest financial services firms in the United States with a history dating back t...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:23,432
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
banco BV

banco BV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Citizens

Citizens

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for banco BV in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Citizens has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - banco BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

banco BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Citizens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citizens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
banco BV

banco BV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Citizens

Citizens

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CIT1776883843
🔒 Incident : Breach
CITSEFFRO1788892423
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT248072825

FAQ

Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between banco BV company and Citizens company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between banco BV and Citizens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between banco BV and Citizens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - banco BV or Citizens ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - banco BV or Citizens ?
Between banco BV and Citizens, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between banco BV and Citizens, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3