Comparison Overview
Banco Supervielle

Banco Supervielle
Bartolomé Mitre 434, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1054AAC, AR
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Banco Supervielle, de origen familiar, cuenta con una larga trayectoria en el sistema financiero argentino y una posición competitiva líder. Es el 8º banco de capital privado más grande de Argentina en términos de préstamos y el 11º sumando los bancos públicos. Supervie...

Commerzbank AG
Kaiserstraße 16, Frankfurt am Main, 60311, DE
Last Update: 14/08/2026
Commerzbank is the leading bank for the German Mittelstand and a strong partner for around 24,000 corporate client groups. In addition, it supports private and small-business customers in Germany with more than €400 billion assets under management. The Bank’s two Busine...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Banco Supervielle







Commerzbank AG






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Banco Supervielle in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Commerzbank AG in 2026.
Incident History - Banco Supervielle (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Banco Supervielle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Commerzbank AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Commerzbank AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Banco Supervielle

Commerzbank AG
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.