Comparison Overview
Santander Argentina

Santander Argentina
Avenida Bartolomé Mitre 480, Buenos Aires, Ciudad autónoma de Buenos Aires, 1430, AR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Somos el Equipo de Santander Río, 7.800 personas que buscamos compartir nuestras iniciativas orientadas a construir cada día, en cada Oficina, en cada Sucursal un mejor lugar para trabajar. Dar forma a una empresa orientada a las personas, creando un entorno que pri...

ING
Bijlmerdreef 106, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1102 CT
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ING is a pioneer in digital banking and on the forefront as one of the most innovative banks in the world. As ING, we have a clear purpose that represents our conviction of people’s potential. We don’t judge, coach, or tell people how to live their lives. However big or...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Santander Argentina







ING






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Santander Argentina in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ING in 2026.
Incident History - Santander Argentina (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Santander Argentina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ING (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Santander Argentina

ING
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.