Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Banco Pichincha PerúBanco Pichincha Perú
VS
Groupe BPCEGroupe BPCE
Banco Pichincha Perú

Banco Pichincha Perú

AV. RICARDO PALMA 278, Lima, Lima, LI18, PE

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pichincha.pe/
766/1000Fair

La historia de nuestro Banco se inicia en Julio de 1964, como Financiera y Promotora de la Construcción S.A. Luego en enero de 1982, se modificó su denominación a FINANPRO Empresa Financiera. Es el 21 de Noviembre de 1986 cuando nos constituimos como el Banco comercial ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:1,618
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Groupe BPCE

Groupe BPCE

7, Promenade Germaine Sablon, Paris, 75013, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://groupebpce.com/
792/1000Fair

Groupe BPCE, at the service of its customers and the French economy Groupe BPCE pursues a full range of banking and insurance activities, working through its two major Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne cooperative banking networks and through its different subsid...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:46,018
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Banco Pichincha Perú

Banco Pichincha Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Groupe BPCE

Groupe BPCE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banco Pichincha Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupe BPCE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Banco Pichincha Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banco Pichincha Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Groupe BPCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupe BPCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Banco Pichincha Perú

Banco Pichincha Perú

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Groupe BPCE

Groupe BPCE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and Groupe BPCE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and Groupe BPCE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and Groupe BPCE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Banco Pichincha Perú or Groupe BPCE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Banco Pichincha Perú or Groupe BPCE ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and Groupe BPCE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and Groupe BPCE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8