Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Banco Pichincha PerúBanco Pichincha Perú
VS
BNP Paribas FortisBNP Paribas Fortis
Banco Pichincha Perú

Banco Pichincha Perú

AV. RICARDO PALMA 278, Lima, Lima, LI18, PE

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pichincha.pe/
766/1000Fair

La historia de nuestro Banco se inicia en Julio de 1964, como Financiera y Promotora de la Construcción S.A. Luego en enero de 1982, se modificó su denominación a FINANPRO Empresa Financiera. Es el 21 de Noviembre de 1986 cuando nos constituimos como el Banco comercial ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:1,618
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

Rue Montagne du Parc 3, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

For over 200 years, BNP Paribas Fortis has helped drive the growth and prosperity of Belgium’s economy and communities. The mission of our 12,000 colleagues is clear: be the trusted financial partner for four million individual customers, businesses and organisations. W...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:12,028
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Banco Pichincha Perú

Banco Pichincha Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banco Pichincha Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Fortis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Banco Pichincha Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banco Pichincha Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BNP Paribas Fortis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas Fortis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Banco Pichincha Perú

Banco Pichincha Perú

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BNP Paribas Fortis

BNP Paribas Fortis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú company and BNP Paribas Fortis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Banco Pichincha Perú or BNP Paribas Fortis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Banco Pichincha Perú or BNP Paribas Fortis ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Banco Pichincha Perú and BNP Paribas Fortis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2