Comparison Overview
Banco de Chile

Banco de Chile
Ahumada 251, Santiago, Santiago, 8320206, CL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Somos una Corporación líder y comprometida con el país que brinda servicios financieros de excelencia a cada segmento de clientes. Buscamos permanentemente ser el mejor Banco para ellos, ser el mejor lugar para trabajar y ser la mejor inversión para nuestros accionistas...

Garanti BBVA
Nisbetiye Mh., Aytar Caddesi No:2 Zincirlikuyu, Istanbul, Istanbul, TR
Last Update: 31/03/2026
With a digitalization and people oriented vision, we contribute to our economy and society. We make great efforts to help you make the best financial decisions by offering you the opportunities of the future with our dynamic business model, pioneering technology and inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Banco de Chile







Garanti BBVA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Banco de Chile in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Garanti BBVA in 2026.
Incident History - Banco de Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Banco de Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Garanti BBVA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Garanti BBVA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Banco de Chile

Garanti BBVA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.