Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brooke Army Medical CenterBrooke Army Medical Center
VS
Scripps HealthScripps Health
Brooke Army Medical Center

Brooke Army Medical Center

3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, 78234, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bamc.tricare.mil/
758/1000Fair

Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, is proud to provide safe, quality care to our military service members, their families, veterans and civilian emergency patients as the most robust and productive healthcare organization within the Military H...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,523
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Scripps Health

Scripps Health

10140 Campus Point Dr, San Diego, 92121, US

Last Update: 18/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://careers.scripps.org/
583/1000Very Poor

Whether you are searching for your next career opportunity or looking for care for yourself or a family member, you’ll find what you need at Scripps. Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps is a non-profit integrated health care delivery system...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,706
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brooke Army Medical Center

Brooke Army Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Scripps Health

Scripps Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brooke Army Medical Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Scripps Health has 6.54% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Brooke Army Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brooke Army Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Scripps Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scripps Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brooke Army Medical Center

Brooke Army Medical Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BRO2227181122
Scripps Health

Scripps Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SCR1776486361
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SCR424051324
🔒 Incident : Breach
SCR2330291222

FAQ

Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center company and Scripps Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center and Scripps Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center and Scripps Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brooke Army Medical Center or Scripps Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brooke Army Medical Center or Scripps Health ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center and Scripps Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brooke Army Medical Center and Scripps Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3