Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BAM Materieel bvBAM Materieel bv
VS
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
BAM Materieel bv

BAM Materieel bv

De Serpeling 120, Lelystad, 8219 PZ, NL

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bammaterieel.nl
753/1000Fair

BAM Materieel heeft zich in de afgelopen jaren ontwikkeld tot een slagvaardig materieelbedrijf. Jarenlange kennis en ervaring op het gebied van ontwerp en levering van materieeltoepassingen zijn gebundeld in een professionele organisatie. Als onderdeel van de Koninklijk...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

900 7th Street, NW, Washington, 20001, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ibew.org
727/1000Moderate

The IBEW represents 860,000 active. and retired who work in a wide variety of fields, including utilities, construction, telecommunications, broadcasting, manufacturing, railroads and government. The IBEW has members in both the United States and Canada and stands out ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:13,005
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BAM Materieel bv

BAM Materieel bv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAM Materieel bv in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BAM Materieel bv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAM Materieel bv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BAM Materieel bv

BAM Materieel bv

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBE3502335110725
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBE827072925

FAQ

Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BAM Materieel bv company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BAM Materieel bv and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BAM Materieel bv and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BAM Materieel bv or International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BAM Materieel bv or International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) ?
Between BAM Materieel bv and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BAM Materieel bv and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1