Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BAM Interbuild bvBAM Interbuild bv
VS
NCC LimitedNCC Limited
BAM Interbuild bv

BAM Interbuild bv

Borsbeeksebrug 22, Berchem, 2600, BE

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.baminterbuild.be
753/1000Fair

BAM Interbuild is currently one of the largest construction companies in the Benelux region and is a member of the Royal BAM Group. The company focuses on new development and renovation within the private and public sectors, as well as within the residential and health ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NCC Limited

NCC Limited

NCC House, Hyderabad, 500081, IN

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ncclimited.com
754/1000Fair

Across decades, across disciplines, NCC Ltd has dedicated itself to building infrastructure of uncompromising standards. Infrastructure that is a constant reminder of the Company’s holistic construction expertise, which in turn is the result of relentless innovation and...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:12,323
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BAM Interbuild bv

BAM Interbuild bv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NCC Limited

NCC Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAM Interbuild bv in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCC Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BAM Interbuild bv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAM Interbuild bv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NCC Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCC Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BAM Interbuild bv

BAM Interbuild bv

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NCC Limited

NCC Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv company and NCC Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv and NCC Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv and NCC Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BAM Interbuild bv or NCC Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BAM Interbuild bv or NCC Limited ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv and NCC Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BAM Interbuild bv and NCC Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA