Comparison Overview

Baltimore City Public Schools

VS

Peel District School Board

Baltimore City Public Schools

200 E North Ave, Baltimore, MD, US, 21202
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Since 1829, Baltimore City Public Schools prepares its nearly 75,000 students for higher education and a life-sustaining career. We proudly serve our students through 164 schools and programs. Our important work is guided by our strategic plan: Building a Generation: City Schools’ Blueprint for Success and its three focus areas: literacy, student wholeness, and staff leadership. We are Baltimore City and we believe every student can succeed. We invite you to join us in this work. Learn more about our mission and victories by following us here or by visiting baltimorecityschools.org.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 8,049
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Peel District School Board

5650 Hurontario St, Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The Peel District School Board serves more than 156,000 students in kindergarten to grade 12. Operating more than 257 schools in the municipalities of Brampton, Caledon and Mississauga, the Peel board is the largest employer in Peel. At the Peel board, we inspire success, confidence and hope in each student. Everything we do is designed to help all students reach high levels of achievement—starting with a long list of available programs and support services. If you are interested in working at the Peel board, visit our online job database: www.peelschools.org/jobs/jobpostings For updates and more information, follow us on Twitter and Instagram at @Peelschools or like us on Facebook.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 10,303
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltcityschools.jpeg
Baltimore City Public Schools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peel-district-school-board.jpeg
Peel District School Board
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baltimore City Public Schools
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peel District School Board
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

Baltimore City Public Schools has 110.53% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peel District School Board in 2025.

Incident History — Baltimore City Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltimore City Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peel District School Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peel District School Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltcityschools.jpeg
Baltimore City Public Schools
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peel-district-school-board.jpeg
Peel District School Board
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Peel District School Board company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Baltimore City Public Schools company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Baltimore City Public Schools company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Peel District School Board company has not reported any.

In the current year, Baltimore City Public Schools company has reported more cyber incidents than Peel District School Board company.

Neither Peel District School Board company nor Baltimore City Public Schools company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Baltimore City Public Schools company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Peel District School Board company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Peel District School Board company nor Baltimore City Public Schools company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools company nor Peel District School Board company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools company nor Peel District School Board company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peel District School Board company employs more people globally than Baltimore City Public Schools company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baltimore City Public Schools nor Peel District School Board holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X