Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Balfour Beatty VINCIBalfour Beatty VINCI
VS
Tetra TechTetra Tech
Balfour Beatty VINCI

Balfour Beatty VINCI

The Podium, London, NW1 2 DN, GB

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

TRANSFORMING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Balfour Beatty VINCI is a long established Joint Venture between two global leaders in the delivery of critical infrastructure. We started working together over 30 years ago to deliver the Channel Tunnel as members ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:1,582
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tetra Tech

Tetra Tech

3475 East Foothill Blvd., Pasadena, 91107, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tetratech.com
779/1000Fair

Tetra Tech is the leader in water, environment, and sustainable infrastructure, providing high-end consulting and engineering services for projects worldwide. With 25,000 employees working together, Tetra Tech provides clear solutions to complex problems by Leading with...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:28,036
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Balfour Beatty VINCI

Balfour Beatty VINCI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tetra Tech

Tetra Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Balfour Beatty VINCI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tetra Tech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Balfour Beatty VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Balfour Beatty VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tetra Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tetra Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Balfour Beatty VINCI

Balfour Beatty VINCI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tetra Tech

Tetra Tech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI company and Tetra Tech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI and Tetra Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI and Tetra Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Balfour Beatty VINCI or Tetra Tech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Balfour Beatty VINCI or Tetra Tech ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI and Tetra Tech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Balfour Beatty VINCI and Tetra Tech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2