Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Baker McKenzie StockholmBaker McKenzie Stockholm
VS
DLA PiperDLA Piper
Baker McKenzie Stockholm

Baker McKenzie Stockholm

Vasagatan 7, Stockholm, 111 20, SE

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Baker McKenzie is a truly global law firm. Founded in 1949, we advise many of the world’s most dynamic and successful business organisations through our 13,000 people in 78 offices across 46 countries.

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:30
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

160 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HT, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com
782/1000Fair

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:13,333
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Baker McKenzie Stockholm

Baker McKenzie Stockholm

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker McKenzie Stockholm in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Baker McKenzie Stockholm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker McKenzie Stockholm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Baker McKenzie Stockholm

Baker McKenzie Stockholm

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm company and DLA Piper company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Baker McKenzie Stockholm or DLA Piper ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Baker McKenzie Stockholm or DLA Piper ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm and DLA Piper, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Baker McKenzie Stockholm and DLA Piper, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53532
SUMMARY

OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.12, a crafted HTJ2K-compressed EXR file causes an unconditional process abort in any application that calls exr_start_read() on untrusted input, resulting in denial of service. The crash is triggered by a QCD marker whose lower five bits are zero, which OpenEXR passes into the vendored OpenJPH library while constructing the codestream and evaluating its quantization delta parameters. OpenJPH uses an assertion rather than a recoverable error to validate those bits, so any invalid value calls abort() directly and cannot be intercepted by surrounding error handling, a problem compounded by OpenEXR wrapping only its internal HT header parser in error handling while leaving the later codestream read and construction calls unprotected. This issue has been resolved in version 3.4.13.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-78435
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. Affected is the function unlink of the file app/Http/Controllers/Admin/helpdesk/SettingsController.php of the component Logo Handler. Such manipulation of the argument data1 leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-78434
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. This impacts the function FormController::post_ticket_reply of the file app/Http/Controllers/Client/helpdesk/FormController.php of the component post-ticket-reply Endpoint. This manipulation causes missing authentication. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78284
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Deletion in MasterStudy LMS <= 3.7.42 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78282
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Stripe Payments <= 2.1.2 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8