Comparison Overview
Baker Tilly Portugal

Baker Tilly Portugal
Av. Columbano Bordalo Pinheiro, 108, 1º B, Lisboa, Lisboa, PT, 1070-067 Lisboa
Last Update: 22/04/2026
A Baker Tilly International através das firmas membro nos diversos países assume um compromisso de serviço de excelência aos seus clientes, quer a nível local, quer a nível global. A Baker Tilly International desenvolve a sua actividade em 137 países, através de 738 esc...

Straive
77 Robinson Road, # 13-00, Singapore, SG, 068896
Last Update: 04/04/2026
At Straive, we operationalize Data Analytics and AI for global enterprises, working with several Fortune 500 companies. We don’t just build world-class data analytics and AI solutions—we embed them seamlessly into your core workflows. This drives greater efficiency, enh...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Baker Tilly Portugal







Straive






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Baker Tilly Portugal in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Straive in 2026.
Incident History - Baker Tilly Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Baker Tilly Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Straive (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Straive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Baker Tilly Portugal

Straive
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.