Comparison Overview
Baker Tilly Netherlands

Baker Tilly Netherlands
Papendorpseweg 53-59, Utrecht, 3528 BJ, NL
Last Update: 13/12/2025
Meer dan cijfers: wij zijn jouw partner in groei Bij Baker Tilly kijken we verder. We zijn je sparringpartner, je kritische meedenker en de expert die naast je staat op de momenten die ertoe doen. Samen brengen we jouw organisatie in beweging. Vandaag én morgen. Samen ...

Aegon
Schiphol Boulevard 223, Schiphol, 1118 BH, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
People are living longer, and we are excited about the possibilities this brings. We see longevity, aging, and changing life patterns as an opportunity for our customers, our employees, and society as a whole. And we want to support everyone in building the financial me...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Baker Tilly Netherlands







Aegon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Baker Tilly Netherlands in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aegon in 2026.
Incident History - Baker Tilly Netherlands (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Baker Tilly Netherlands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aegon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aegon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Baker Tilly Netherlands

Aegon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.