Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel GhaffarBaker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar
VS
LPL FinancialLPL Financial
Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

CAIRO, EG

Last Update: 26/01/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

We are a leading accountancy firm in Egypt, and a member firm in Baker Tilly International. We offer a comprehensive range of services on high quality levels. Our partners and expert staff adhere to professional leadership and client service complying with plans and pro...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:318
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LPL Financial

LPL Financial

4707 Executive Drive, San Diego, 92121-1968, US

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.lpl.com/
622/1000Poor

LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: LPLA) is among the fastest growing wealth management firms in the U.S. As a leader in the financial advisor-mediated marketplace, LPL supports over 29,000 financial advisors and the wealth management practices of approximately 1,10...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:14,964
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LPL Financial

LPL Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

LPL Financial has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LPL Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPL Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LPL Financial

LPL Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASHLPL1768395244
🔒 Incident : Breach
LPLMAR1780432565
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AMEHIGLPLEDE1777062318

FAQ

Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar company and LPL Financial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar and LPL Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar and LPL Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar or LPL Financial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar or LPL Financial ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar and LPL Financial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar and LPL Financial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA