Comparison Overview
Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar
CAIRO, EG
Last Update: 26/01/2026
We are a leading accountancy firm in Egypt, and a member firm in Baker Tilly International. We offer a comprehensive range of services on high quality levels. Our partners and expert staff adhere to professional leadership and client service complying with plans and pro...

Aditya Birla Capital
One World Center, Tower 1, 18th Floor, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai, IN, 400013
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Aditya Birla Capital Ltd is a financial services company based out of One World Center, Tower 1, 18th Floor, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, MUMBAI, India. - Aditya Birla Capital is committed to provide equal opportunity to all in em...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar







Aditya Birla Capital






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Capital in 2026.
Incident History - Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aditya Birla Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aditya Birla Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Baker Tilly Hilal & Abdel Ghaffar

Aditya Birla Capital
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.