Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bundesamt für Kultur BAKBundesamt für Kultur BAK
VS
State of MissouriState of Missouri
Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Hallwylstrasse 15, Bern, undefined, 3003, CH

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bak.admin.ch/
759/1000Fair

Wir als Bundesamt für Kultur BAK engagieren uns für den Schutz des kulturellen Erbes und für die Förderung eines vielfältigen und qualitativ hochstehenden Kulturangebots. Darüber hinaus setzen wir uns für den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt in seiner Vielfalt und für di...

NAICS:922
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
State of Missouri

State of Missouri

301 W High Street PO BOX 809, Jefferson City, Missouri, US, 65101

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mo.gov
757/1000Fair

Build the Missouri of tomorrow. Ensure a strong foundation today. Join a group of innovative team members focused on driving the State of Missouri forward. As public servants, our team members have the opportunity to produce work that is both lasting and important. Thi...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,114
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Missouri

State of Missouri

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bundesamt für Kultur BAK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Missouri in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bundesamt für Kultur BAK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Missouri (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Missouri cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
State of Missouri

State of Missouri

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STA2502125100825

FAQ

Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and State of Missouri company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and State of Missouri, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and State of Missouri, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bundesamt für Kultur BAK or State of Missouri ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bundesamt für Kultur BAK or State of Missouri ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and State of Missouri, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and State of Missouri, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1