Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bundesamt für Kultur BAKBundesamt für Kultur BAK
VS
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Hallwylstrasse 15, Bern, undefined, 3003, CH

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bak.admin.ch/
759/1000Fair

Wir als Bundesamt für Kultur BAK engagieren uns für den Schutz des kulturellen Erbes und für die Förderung eines vielfältigen und qualitativ hochstehenden Kulturangebots. Darüber hinaus setzen wir uns für den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt in seiner Vielfalt und für di...

NAICS:922
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, 30333, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cdc.gov
801/1000Good

CDC works 24/7 keeping America safe from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights it and supports communities and ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:20,185
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bundesamt für Kultur BAK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bundesamt für Kultur BAK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Bundesamt für Kultur BAK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEN05319622

FAQ

Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bundesamt für Kultur BAK or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bundesamt für Kultur BAK or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bundesamt für Kultur BAK and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2