Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Bain Capital

Bain Capital Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

baincapital.com

Founded in 1984, Bain Capital is one of the world’s leading private investment firms. We are committed to creating lasting impact for our investors, teams, businesses, and the communities in which we live. As a private partnership, we lead with conviction and a culture of collaboration, advantages that enable us to innovate investment approaches, unlock opportunities, and create exceptional outcomes. Our global platform invests across five focus areas: Private Equity, Growth & Venture, Capital Solutions, Credit & Capital Markets, and Real Assets. In these focus areas, we bring deep sector expertise and wide-ranging capabilities. We have 24 offices on four continents, more than 1,850 employees, and approximately $185 billion in assets


Bain Capital A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Bain Capital
Company Information
Website:http://www.baincapital.com
Employees number:2,245
Number of followers:418,829
NAICS:52
Industry Type:Financial Services
Homepage:baincapital.com
Bain Capital Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
Bain CapitalFinancial Services
Updated:
30/04/2026
508/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Bain Capital Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Bain CapitalFinancial Services
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Bain Capital
Bain CapitalCritical
Current Score
508C (CRITICAL)
01000
2 incidents
-143 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
518Before Incident
JUNE 2026
516Before Incident
MAY 2026
509Before Incident
APRIL 2026
508Before Incident
MARCH 2026
644Before Incident
Breach
19 Mar 2026Bain Capital
PowerSchool Holdings Inc. and Bain Capital: Bain Struggles to Dismiss PowerSchool User Data Breach Claims

PowerSchool and Bain Face Legal Setback in Data Breach Lawsuit

501After Incident
CRITICAL-143
BAIPOW1773952067
PowerSchool and Bain Face Legal Setback in Data Breach Lawsuit A California federal judge has partially denied motions to dismiss a lawsuit against PowerSchool Holdings Inc. and Bain Capital, allowing data breach claims from individual users and school districts to proceed. The plaintiffs allege that after Bain’s merger with PowerSchool, the company offshored cybersecurity functions to contractors, leading to vulnerabilities that exposed sensitive data. The lawsuit centers on a cyber incident affecting nearly 50 million individuals, with claims that the offshoring of data-management tools enabled vendors to bypass consent protocols and access protected school district systems. The ruling, issued on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, rejects Bain’s attempt to fully dismiss the case, signaling potential legal and financial repercussions for the companies involved. The decision underscores growing scrutiny over third-party cybersecurity risks and corporate accountability in large-scale data breaches. Further proceedings will determine liability and potential damages.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive data of nearly 50 million individualsSystems Affected: Protected school district systemsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential legal and financial repercussionsLegal Liabilities: Lawsuit proceedings ongoing
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Sensitive data, personally identifiable informationNumber Of Records Exposed: Nearly 50 millionSensitivity Of Data: High (protected school district systems)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
FEBRUARY 2026
642Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
640Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
638Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
636Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
633Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
631Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
628Before Incident
DECEMBER 2024
756Before Incident
Breach
28 Dec 2024Bain Capital
PowerSchool and Bain Capital: Private Equity Firm Potentially on Hook for Portfolio Company’s D

Bain Capital Faces Legal Action Over PowerSchool Data Breach

607After Incident
CRITICAL-149
BAIPOW1777566589
Bain Capital Faces Legal Action Over PowerSchool Data Breach, Setting Precedent for Private Equity Liability A federal judge in California has allowed a lawsuit against Bain Capital to proceed, marking a potential turning point in holding private equity (PE) firms accountable for cybersecurity failures at acquired companies even those predating the acquisition. The case stems from a massive data breach at PowerSchool, a K-12 education software provider, which exposed the personal data of 60 million students and 10 million teachers across North America. ### The Acquisition and Breach Timeline Bain Capital acquired PowerSchool in a $5.6 billion deal that closed on October 1, 2024, following negotiations that began in August 2022. However, the breach originated before the acquisition in August 2024, when a threat actor used stolen vendor credentials to infiltrate PowerSchool’s systems. Initial data exfiltration from a single school district occurred in September 2024, but the full scope of the breach went undetected until December 28, 2024, when the hacking group ShinyHackers demanded a ransom. The stolen data transferred to a cloud provider in Ukraine included Social Security numbers, medical records, financial details, addresses, disability records, and custody information. PowerSchool publicly disclosed the breach on January 7, 2025, prompting multiple class-action lawsuits. ### Legal Ruling and Allegations Against Bain On March 18, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that claims against Bain could proceed, rejecting the firm’s motion to dismiss. The court found sufficient evidence to support allegations that Bain: - Ratified cost-cutting measures that included layoffs of domestic cybersecurity staff. - Held pre-closing veto rights over major expenditures, vendor contracts, and workforce changes. - Replaced PowerSchool’s entire board post-acquisition. - Directed the offshoring of IT and cybersecurity functions, including tools that bypassed consent protocols, enabling unauthorized access. - Failed to assess risks from the offshoring it mandated. - Oversaw layoffs of critical IT staff, including at least 5% of the workforce. The court dismissed Bain’s argument that a "disclaimer of control" clause in the acquisition agreement shielded it from liability, ruling that the firm’s actions demonstrated de facto control over PowerSchool’s operations. ### Broader Implications for Private Equity The ruling suggests that PE firms may face legal exposure for cybersecurity failures at portfolio companies, even if breaches occurred before acquisition. The case underscores the need for thorough pre- and post-acquisition cybersecurity due diligence, particularly when restructuring operations or reducing costs. While the litigation remains ongoing, the decision signals a potential shift in how courts view parent company liability in data breach cases especially when PE firms exert operational control over acquired entities.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Ransom, Data Exfiltration
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Social Security numbers, medical records, financial details, addresses, disability records, custody informationOperational Impact: Layoffs of critical IT staff, offshoring of cybersecurity functionsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to PowerSchool and Bain CapitalLegal Liabilities: Class-action lawsuits, regulatory scrutinyIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of SSNs and other PII)Payment Information Risk: High (financial details exposed)
DATA BREACH
Social Security numbersMedical recordsFinancial detailsAddressesDisability recordsCustody informationNumber Of Records Exposed: 70 million (60M students + 10M teachers)Sensitivity Of Data: High (Personally Identifiable Information, Medical, Financial)Data Exfiltration: Yes (transferred to a cloud provider in Ukraine)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Bain Capital ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Bain Capital's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Bain Capital ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Bain Capital's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?