Comparison Overview

Bain & Company

VS

Jacobs

Bain & Company

131 Dartmouth Street, Boston, MA, 02116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bain.com

Bain & Company is a global consultancy that helps the world’s most ambitious change makers define the future. Across 65 cities in 40 countries, we work alongside our clients as one team with a shared ambition to achieve extraordinary results, outperform the competition, and redefine industries. We complement our tailored, integrated expertise with a vibrant ecosystem of digital innovators to deliver better, faster, and more enduring outcomes. Our 10-year commitment to invest more than $1 billion in pro bono services brings our talent, expertise, and insight to organizations tackling today’s urgent challenges in education, racial equity, social justice, economic development, and the environment. We earned a platinum rating from EcoVadis, the leading platform for environmental, social, and ethical performance ratings for global supply chains, putting us in the top 1% of all companies. Since our founding in 1973, we have measured our success by the success of our clients, and we proudly maintain the highest level of client

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 21,936
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Jacobs

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1200, Dallas, TX, 75201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jacobs.com

At Jacobs, we're challenging today to reinvent tomorrow – delivering outcomes and solutions for the world's most complex challenges. With a team of approximately 45,000, we provide end-to-end services in advanced manufacturing, cities & places, energy, environmental, life sciences, transportation and water. From advisory and consulting, feasibility, planning, design, program and lifecycle management, we're creating a more connected and sustainable world.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 65,143
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bain-and-company.jpeg
Bain & Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobs.jpeg
Jacobs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bain & Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jacobs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bain & Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacobs in 2025.

Incident History — Bain & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bain & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jacobs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacobs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bain-and-company.jpeg
Bain & Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobs.jpeg
Jacobs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bain & Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jacobs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jacobs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bain & Company company.

In the current year, Jacobs company and Bain & Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jacobs company nor Bain & Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jacobs company nor Bain & Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jacobs company nor Bain & Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bain & Company company nor Jacobs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Jacobs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bain & Company company.

Jacobs company employs more people globally than Bain & Company company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Jacobs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References