Comparison Overview

Bain & Company

VS

Capgemini Invent

Bain & Company

131 Dartmouth Street, Boston, MA, 02116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Bain & Company is a global consultancy that helps the world’s most ambitious change makers define the future. Across 65 cities in 40 countries, we work alongside our clients as one team with a shared ambition to achieve extraordinary results, outperform the competition, and redefine industries. We complement our tailored, integrated expertise with a vibrant ecosystem of digital innovators to deliver better, faster, and more enduring outcomes. Our 10-year commitment to invest more than $1 billion in pro bono services brings our talent, expertise, and insight to organizations tackling today’s urgent challenges in education, racial equity, social justice, economic development, and the environment. We earned a platinum rating from EcoVadis, the leading platform for environmental, social, and ethical performance ratings for global supply chains, putting us in the top 1% of all companies. Since our founding in 1973, we have measured our success by the success of our clients, and we proudly maintain the highest level of client

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 21,936
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capgemini Invent

Place de l'Etoile, 11 rue de Tilsitt, Paris, undefined, 75017, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Capgemini Invent is the digital innovation, consulting and transformation brand of the Capgemini Group, a global business line that combines market leading expertise in strategy, technology, data science and creative design, to help CxOs envision and build what’s next for their businesses. For more information: http://www.capgemini.com/invent. Follow us on Twitter @CapgeminiInvent.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 16,459
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bain-and-company.jpeg
Bain & Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capgemini-invent.jpeg
Capgemini Invent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bain & Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capgemini Invent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bain & Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capgemini Invent in 2025.

Incident History — Bain & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bain & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capgemini Invent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capgemini Invent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bain-and-company.jpeg
Bain & Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capgemini-invent.jpeg
Capgemini Invent
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bain & Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capgemini Invent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capgemini Invent company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bain & Company company.

In the current year, Capgemini Invent company and Bain & Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor Bain & Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor Bain & Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor Bain & Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bain & Company company nor Capgemini Invent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capgemini Invent company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bain & Company company.

Bain & Company company employs more people globally than Capgemini Invent company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bain & Company nor Capgemini Invent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N