Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bain & Company TürkiyeBain & Company Türkiye
VS
EY-ParthenonEY-Parthenon
Bain & Company Türkiye

Bain & Company Türkiye

Etiler, Akmerkez Yolu D:B3 Blok, , Istanbul, 34340, TR

Last Update: 18/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Bain & Company dünyada değişimi sağlayan en iddialı oyuncuların, geleceği tasarlamasına yardım eden küresel bir danışmanlık şirketidir. Olağanüstü sonuçlar elde etmek, rekabet içerisinde farklılaşmak ve daha yüksek performans sağlamak ve sektörleri yeniden tanımlamak ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EY-Parthenon

EY-Parthenon

1 More London Place, London, SE1 2AF, GB

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ey.com/parthenon
785/1000Fair

Our unique combination of transformative strategy, transactions and corporate finance delivers real-world value – solutions that work in practice, not just on paper. Benefiting from EY’s full spectrum of services, we’ve reimagined strategic consulting to work in a worl...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:18,222
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bain & Company Türkiye

Bain & Company Türkiye

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EY-Parthenon

EY-Parthenon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bain & Company Türkiye in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EY-Parthenon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bain & Company Türkiye (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bain & Company Türkiye cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EY-Parthenon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EY-Parthenon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bain & Company Türkiye

Bain & Company Türkiye

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EY-Parthenon

EY-Parthenon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye and EY-Parthenon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye and EY-Parthenon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bain & Company Türkiye or EY-Parthenon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bain & Company Türkiye or EY-Parthenon ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye and EY-Parthenon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bain & Company Türkiye and EY-Parthenon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2