Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BaFinBaFin
VS
Mahindra GroupMahindra Group
BaFin

BaFin

Graurheindorfer Straße, Bonn und Frankfurt, North Rhine-Westphalia, undefined, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bafin.de/
753/1000Fair

Die Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht - kurz BaFin - ist die zentrale Aufsichtsbehörde für Banken und Finanzdienstleister, Versicherer und den Wertpapierhandel. Unser Ziel ist als integrierte Aufsicht, die Funktionsfähigkeit, Stabilität und Integrität des...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:699
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Mahindra Group

Mahindra Group

Worli, Mumbai, 400018, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mahindra.com
817/1000Good

Many Companies. One Mahindra. Founded in 1945, the Mahindra Group is one of the largest and most admired multinational federations of companies, with 324,000+ employees across 100+ countries. It enjoys a leadership position in farm equipment, utility vehicles, informat...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:232,062
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BaFin

BaFin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mahindra Group

Mahindra Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BaFin in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mahindra Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BaFin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BaFin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mahindra Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mahindra Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BaFin

BaFin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BAF223510923
Mahindra Group

Mahindra Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BaFin company and Mahindra Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BaFin and Mahindra Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BaFin and Mahindra Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BaFin or Mahindra Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BaFin or Mahindra Group ?
Between BaFin and Mahindra Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BaFin and Mahindra Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2