Comparison Overview
BAE Systems
BAE Systems
BAE Systems, 6 Carlton Gardens, London, GB, SW1Y 5AD
Last Update: 16/10/2026
At BAE Systems, we help our customers to stay a step ahead when protecting people and national security, critical infrastructure and vital information. We provide some of the world’s most advanced, technology-led defence, aerospace and security solutions and employ a sk...
Sandia National Laboratories
PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, 87185, US
Last Update: 22/09/2026
Sandia National Laboratories is the nation’s premier DOE science and engineering lab for national security and technology innovation. Our team of scientists, engineers, researchers, and business specialists apply their knowledge and skill toward delivering cutting-edge ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
BAE Systems
Sandia National Laboratories
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
BAE Systems has 54.55% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sandia National Laboratories in 2026.
Incident History - BAE Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BAE Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sandia National Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sandia National Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
BAE Systems
Sandia National Laboratories
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.